Author Topic: Socrates Knowledge of Divine Ear?  (Read 7622 times)

Jhanon

  • vetted member
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 915
Socrates Knowledge of Divine Ear?
« on: June 26, 2014, 02:37:24 AM »
"This is the voice which I seem to hear murmuring in my ears, like the sound of the flute in the ears of the mystic; that voice, I say, is humming in my ears, and prevents me from hearing any other. "

Perhaps this has already been mentioned on this thread, but I wanted to share it just in the case my memory is incorrect.

Alexander

  • (Shivaswara)
  • vetted member
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1123
Re: Socrates Knowledge of Divine Ear?
« Reply #1 on: June 26, 2014, 04:04:08 AM »
Socrates refers to the divine ear, if I recall correctly, as his "daimonion." That word does not have the connotation of our modern English word "demon," but the meaning in ancient Greek is closer to "deva," or "divine," so I believe it translates as "divine ear."

In The Apology, Socrates explains that he listens to his daimonion in all things, and that it is what guides him to behave as he does at his trial. On another occasion, when Socrates has the opportunity to escape from his sentence in the Crito, he cites his daimonion as the reason why he does not. (Finally, I believe his premonition of his fate after death in the Crito, "that he will go to the land of Phthia," is also a result of his daimonion.)

One of the discussions I had with Jhanananda recently was about the topic of "revealed knowledge." I think that in reference to the trial and his escape, the daimonion is very closely tied to this phenomenon. In this way, we can see it as an Inner Voice. But, at the same time, I do not think what Socrates is referring to is at all different from divine hearing, as well.

To go further, I think it is very worthwhile to return to Plato with a mature, mystical perspective. Often, modern scholars do not see the mysticism of Socrates. I personally have become absolutely convinced of the mysticism of both Socrates and Plato, but especially Socrates.

It is interesting how a contemporary philosophy professor might read Socrates' long discussions of metempsychosis in a way very different from how we might. He might gloss over it, not read it literally, or not understand it in the way in which it was intended to be read. Aside from that, we have other signs of Socrates' attainment, in his discussions of love, his trances, and so on.
« Last Edit: June 26, 2014, 04:11:44 AM by Alexander »
https://alexanderlorincz.com/

"I saw all things gathered in one volume by love - what, in the universe, seemed separate, scattered." (Canto 33)

Jhanananda

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4629
    • Great Wesern Vehicle
Re: Socrates Knowledge of Divine Ear?
« Reply #2 on: June 26, 2014, 12:44:10 PM »
Thank-you, Jhanon, for the useful quote.  We have discussed Socrates on several occasions here.  I gather quotes like this one for support of the fruit of the contemplative life.  Would you happen to recall the book, and translator were you found this quote?
It is interesting how a contemporary philosophy professor might read Socrates' long discussions of metempsychosis in a way very different from how we might. He might gloss over it, not read it literally, or not understand it in the way in which it was intended to be read. Aside from that, we have other signs of Socrates' attainment, in his discussions of love, his trances, and so on.
Yes, I agree, Alexander, scholars rarely understand the experience of mystics, such as Socrates.  I suspect that some of how Socrates uses the term 'daimonion' is much how Siddhartha Gautama tended to use the term 'vipassana' as intuitive. revelatory, insight.
There is no progress without discipline.

If you want to post to this forum, then send me a PM.

Jhanon

  • vetted member
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 915
Re: Socrates Knowledge of Divine Ear?
« Reply #3 on: July 02, 2014, 04:05:34 AM »
As much as I would like to discuss this further, I am making an effort to come back to the forums, and must learn to restrain myself from indulging hours in extensive posts like I tend to do. I simply don't have the time, and so am attempting to prove I can make time for the forums by increasing brevity.

So, in short, we're all on the same page. As for the book I quoted that from, it is an online resource provided me in a philosophy college course I'm taking. The quoted material is at the bottom of the page, although there is some other material that Alexander referenced, which is provided earlier in the excerpt.

 Plato: Crito
http://classics.mit.edu/Plato/crito.html
« Last Edit: July 02, 2014, 04:07:40 AM by Jhanon »