I was reading Alexander's post here:
Your post encourages me to resume my practice. I was doing long sits as well recently, but to no avail. I confess I get quite discouraged. I often read the posts on here about people's ecstasies and I think to myself, "why do these experiences not happen to me?" Then I sit there for hours motionless, in the same state of consciousness as the waking state, and end up feeling like a fool. "Nothing is happening," I think, "there is no bliss or joy or energy..." I think I have to rededicate myself - expect nothing to happen - but just do it straight through for a full 30 days.
Just wanted to give a short response on my blog. I think the best way to think about it is that we are continuously disconnecting ourselves from Spirit. If we let go, we are naturally reunited with Spirit. Therefore, we need to identify the ways we are separating ourselves from Spirit. We often indulge in the animal-side of man, investing deeply in this flesh-body and hence the concept of 'spatial existence' and when we let go, we don't truly let go.
I remember when I used to sit long without any results too.
I find the best portal for me is "experience-stuff". One of the best portals for me is thought. When thought arises, we become hyper-aware of it happening. But instead of paying attention to the thought content, try to feel and sense the energy of the thought and what it is made out of. Suddenly, we become aware of this sense of a transparent-like, holographic-like energy that seems to form a thought. The paradox is that when we follow the "thought-stuff" instead of its contents, we actually disengage from the stories of the mind and start to pay attention to what is really happening right now, like what Eckhart Tolle calls the 'power of now'.
As we sit there, simply just watching thoughts arise and bubble away, I don't just focus on the nothingness, but I focus on the entire experience without rejecting it. Almost like a dance of energy. And you're not separate from the dance, you're just being one with this 'experience-stuff'. As we examine more deeply this 'experience-stuff', suddenly the other senses start to "unlock" too.
The next easiest sense for me is really the tactile sensations. If you find the sensation, you also start to realize that we impute ideas of space and time over just pure sensation. For example, if I feel tingling, how do I know "where" and "how intense" it is? It is just tingling - and before even a name, that pure experience of tingling. Slowly we then start to find that this entire field of tactile sensations happens 'nowhere', not 'inside a body'. It is also made of the same 'experience-stuff'. Then as we go on, sound is the next easiest for me, especially when the auditory charism arises. In a sense, it is almost as if awareness has become less fragmented. After sound, sight - but I don't really pay much attention to that because the senses start to converge into a singular field of "pure consciousness stuff". The 'one eye' or 'one taste' or 'one sense'.
So when I sit, it is not just an experience of a 'body'. It is the experience of sight, sound, taste, smell, touch and thoughts, as if it was made of a "pure experience material" - I hesitate to really call it anything, even 'energy', maybe spirit would be a nice word. That which breathes life into experience in a dance. So as the practice goes on, strangely, it doesn't become 'blankness' - instead it becomes dynamic presencing of everything - full of life and the charisms.
I remember when I had that spontaneous light bursting forth from the heart, I could not locate my body, just one expanse of white light. But it wasn't that I couldn't locate it - it took effort. So it was almost like I needed effort to impute a thought in, to "find my body", to "define the edges". Kind of like post-jhana and you get out of a deep state and it takes a while to recalibrate.
About accessing this 'now' (which is later gone beyond), I guess it is like the sense of combining these approaches:
1. having the perception of things not even "rising" completely and passing away as soon as they arise, hence every effort we strive for in the world of sensory pleasure falls to naught - that acknowledgement is renunciation imo. (Girimananda sutta has a
good list of "perceptions")
2. being completely immersed in experiencing, be it paying attention to the charisms or meditation object, away from indulging in thoughts
3. not falling prey to thought content and its stories