Categorizing the levels of religion (short article)

[Alexander]

I wrote this for an outside purpose but thought it was a pretty clear way of explaining religions so I wanted to share it

I have been pondering an argument I could make about religion. Over the years I have spoken to many so-called “religious people” and found they can be some of the most difficult and unpleasant people to interact with. They can be judgmental, narrow minded, and provincial. At the same time, I have always been inspired by the great spiritual figures of humanity, such as Christ, the Buddha, Dante, Walt Whitman, and John of the Cross, and believe them to be among the greatest figures of mankind. The contradiction here - that religion can produce both the worst and best people - is what I want to reconcile.

Interestingly, we find that these figures - both the worst and the best - are often produced by the same religion. Thus, it is not appropriate to say “well, these religions over here are good” and “these religions over here are bad.” Christianity has produced both inquisitors as well as philanthropists. Thus, we will take the perennialist’s position, and simply state that all religions are attempts at man to express certain universal truths about the human condition; that the outward forms they take on are simply reflections of the cultures and psychologies of the civilizations that produced them.

Thus I wanted to propose categorizing the followers of every religion in the following way. Individuals may belong to the same faith, but they interpret it according to these different stages of maturity.

1. Superstition
The lowest level of religion. A childlike understanding of it. Results in mass hysteria, violence, or witch hunts. The world is ruled by spirits. Magic is possible. Religion is corrupted by man’s weaknesses.

2. Dogma
A slightly higher form of religion. The tenets of faith are codified. However, the faith becomes repressive, insecure, and controlling. It falls under the influence of fallible human institutions. Here we can think of the Popes who lived in sprawling pleasure-palaces, and the great affluence and avarice of the Church. We can think of the Inquisition, the Catechism, and the drive for conformity of belief. This stage of religion can have utility in bringing social and political order, but simultaneously censors and suppresses human flourishing.

Here I will mention that it is not by accident that Christ criticized the Pharisees (the religious authorities) in the Gospels, referring to those at this stage of religion; or that in the Paradiso St. Peter becomes irate when discussing the corruption of the Catholic Church to Dante.

3. Transcendent-mystical
The highest form of religion. I would argue that this is the “adult” or “mature” understanding of faith. It is usually observed in the initial founder of a religion. It is visible in figures such as Christ or the Buddha. It is also embodied by the major saints and mystics of a faith who follow the personal life-path that returns man to the transcendent. It is open and tolerant (unlike the former stages) as it sees the divine in all. It is a faith that embodies the “mysterium tremendum et fascinans.”

A final category - though it does not quite fit the above - would be what I would call “pathologies of religion.” This would represent a lower level of religion than that of superstition. This would include movements founded by cult leaders that exist only to enrich or empower themselves. These kinds of groups are harmful and damaging. Indeed, in life we find pathologies exist of everything, and religion is no exception. These movements take advantage of the desire deep in human nature to commune with the sacred, and exploit it for selfish and destructive ends (ie, the benefit of the founder, a charlatan).

[Tad]

Hi Alexander,

categorizing various aspects of spiritual practice or attainments is always interesting. Even though it is all theory it reveals certain aspects of what we call human life. I think your list has good foundation. Just need to add more categories. For example, there exists the type of followers that are somewhere between dogmatic and mystic. They tend to focus on qualities such as kindness and compassion for others. They typically are not hardcore about doctrine. But at the same time they are too focused on worldy life rather than going beyond as mystics.

[Alexander]

Hi Alexander,

categorizing various aspects of spiritual practice or attainments is always interesting. Even though it is all theory it reveals certain aspects of what we call human life. I think your list has good foundation. Just need to add more categories. For example, there exists the type of followers that are somewhere between dogmatic and mystic. They tend to focus on qualities such as kindness and compassion for others. They typically are not hardcore about doctrine. But at the same time they are too focused on worldy life rather than going beyond as mystics.

hm we would probably put them somewhere in #3, but they have not followed the life-path yet. so, the potential lies dormant. but they are not falling prey to the failings of superstition, nor falling into intolerance and persecution like happens to the dogmatic. they intuitively understand the perennial thesis, but need to follow it for it to reach its full conclusion

note these aren't "rankings" like streamwinner, nonreturner, etc, but rather sociological categories.

I wrote this as part of a graduate course I am doing on religions. This week I am doing a chapter on Indian religions. I might publish the whole collection when it's done (a month or two). It would a very academic read, but could be useful

[Jhanananda]

More than anything I find contemplative traditions that understand and value depth in meditation characterizes the highest religious movements. We can see evidence of this in the major mystics: Siddhartha Gautama, Rumi, Kabir, Patanjali, Teresa of Avila and John of the Cross

[Tad]

Jhananda,
That is a good list of the grand teachers of all times. We could add Jesus. But the most dissapoint thing is that it seems no early Christian scriptures about meditation have survived except for some possible hints in the bible.