Author Topic: Space weather and health  (Read 70643 times)

Jhanananda

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4629
    • Great Wesern Vehicle
Re: Re: Electromagnetic radiation and health
« Reply #165 on: January 08, 2015, 02:49:48 PM »
The more I hear about your health condition, the more I am convinced that you have an underlying inflammation.  So, if I were you, then I would concentrate my diet on foods that are rich in anthocyanin.

Also, if you had significant health problems in the last week, then you might also be sensitive to electromagnetic fields (EMF), so if you learn and employ EMF shielding and grounding, then it is likely to help you.

Yesterday I awoke with significantly less joint pain from sleeping in the grounded van, than in the previous days not having slept in the grounded van.  Upon waking I changed into work clothes, which are not shielded or grounded.  Within a few hours joint pain had become significant, so I put on my EMF shielded suit.  Within hours joint pain had receded significantly.  So, the EMF shielded suit definitely works during Geomagnetic K-index of level 4 and above solar EMF events, which is what we have been having for at least a week now.

I also have noticed that my morning blood sugar reading has been rising for the last 5 days, and it has risen up to 40 points above my current baseline, with no change in my diet.  However, after my first night's sleep back inside the grounded and shielded van, my blood sugar had dropped 33 point. Therefore, I believe it is reasonable to speculate that the cause of the current rising trend in my blood sugar, and the previous spike events in the last 2 months, may all be due to increased inflammation levels due to increasing EMF from the sun in the last 2 months.

Jan 08, My morning blood sugar reading this morning was 160

Real-Time Geomagnetic Conditions total magnetic field (scalar) TUC Tucson Geomagnetic station 47489.3nT to 47531.6nT, a variation of 42.3nT, with a mean of about 47515nT.

Space Weather reported more solar activity
Quote from: noaa Space Weather
Space Weather Message Code: WARK04
Serial Number: 2435
Issue Time: 2015 Jan 08 0933 UTC

WARNING: Geomagnetic K-index of 4 expected
Valid From: 2015 Jan 08 0945 UTC
Valid To: 2015 Jan 08 1500 UTC
Warning Condition: Onset

NOAA Space Weather Scale descriptions can be found at
www.swpc.noaa.gov/noaa-scales-explanation

Potential Impacts: Area of impact primarily poleward of 65 degrees Geomagnetic Latitude.
Induced Currents - Weak power grid fluctuations can occur.
Aurora - Aurora may be visible at high latitudes such as Canada and Alaska.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Space Weather Message Code: WARK05
Serial Number: 956
Issue Time: 2015 Jan 08 0449 UTC

WARNING: Geomagnetic K-index of 5 expected
Valid From: 2015 Jan 08 0450 UTC
Valid To: 2015 Jan 08 0700 UTC
Warning Condition: Onset
NOAA Scale: G1 - Minor

NOAA Space Weather Scale descriptions can be found at
www.swpc.noaa.gov/noaa-scales-explanation

Potential Impacts: Area of impact primarily poleward of 60 degrees Geomagnetic Latitude.
Induced Currents - Weak power grid fluctuations can occur.
Spacecraft - Minor impact on satellite operations possible.
Aurora - Aurora may be visible at high latitudes, i.e., northern tier of the U.S. such as northern Michigan and Maine.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Space Weather Message Code: WARK04
Serial Number: 2434
Issue Time: 2015 Jan 07 2055 UTC

EXTENDED WARNING: Geomagnetic K-index of 4 expected
Extension to Serial Number: 2433
Valid From: 2015 Jan 07 0632 UTC
Now Valid Until: 2014 Jan 08 0700 UTC
Warning Condition: persistence

NOAA Space Weather Scale descriptions can be found at
www.swpc.noaa.gov/noaa-scales-explanation

Potential Impacts: Area of impact primarily poleward of 65 degrees Geomagnetic Latitude.
Induced Currents - Weak power grid fluctuations can occur.
Aurora - Aurora may be visible at high latitudes such as Canada and Alaska.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Space Weather Message Code: WATA20
Serial Number: 595
Issue Time: 2015 Jan 07 2041 UTC

WATCH: Geomagnetic Storm Category G1 Predicted

Highest Storm Level Predicted by Day:
Jan 08:  G1 (Minor)   Jan 09:  None (Below G1)   Jan 10:  None (Below G1)

THIS SUPERSEDES ANY/ALL PRIOR WATCHES IN EFFECT

NOAA Space Weather Scale descriptions can be found at
www.swpc.noaa.gov/noaa-scales-explanation

Potential Impacts: Area of impact primarily poleward of 60 degrees Geomagnetic Latitude.
Induced Currents - Weak power grid fluctuations can occur.
Spacecraft - Minor impact on satellite operations possible.
Aurora - Aurora may be visible at high latitudes, i.e., northern tier of the U.S. such as northern Michigan and Maine.
« Last Edit: January 25, 2015, 01:45:31 AM by Jhanananda »
There is no progress without discipline.

If you want to post to this forum, then send me a PM.

Jhanananda

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4629
    • Great Wesern Vehicle
Re: Re: Electromagnetic radiation and health
« Reply #166 on: January 08, 2015, 04:51:37 PM »
Scholarly articles on emf effects on health:

Low-level exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields: Health effects and research needs
by Michael H. Repacholi*
Article first published online: 6 DEC 1998
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-186X(1998)19:1<1::AID-BEM1>3.0.CO;2-5
Bioelectromagnetics Volume 19, Issue 1, pages 1–19, 1998
Quote
Keywords:

    RF fields;
    nonthermal;
    biological effects;
    research agenda

Abstract

The World Health Organization (WHO), the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP), and the German and Austrian Governments jointly sponsored an international seminar in November of 1996 on the biological effects of low-level radiofrequency (RF) electromagnetic fields. For purposes of this seminar, RF fields having frequencies only in the range of about 10 MHz to 300 GHz were considered. This is one of a series of scientific review seminars held under the International Electromagnetic Field (EMF) Project to identify any health hazards from EMF exposure. The scientific literature was reviewed during the seminar and expert working groups formed to provide a status report on possible health effects from exposure to low-level RF fields and identify gaps in knowledge requiring more research to improve health risk assessments.

It was concluded that, although hazards from exposure to high-level (thermal) RF fields were established, no known health hazards were associated with exposure to RF sources emitting fields too low to cause a significant temperature rise in tissue. Biological effects from low-level RF exposure were identified needing replication and further study. These included in vitro studies of cell kinetics and proliferation effects, effects on genes, signal transduction effects and alterations in membrane structure and function, and biophysical and biochemical mechanisms for RF field effects. In vivo studies should focus on the potential for cancer promotion, co-promotion and progression, as well as possible synergistic, genotoxic, immunological, and carcinogenic effects associated with chronic low-level RF exposure. Research is needed to determine whether low-level RF exposure causes DNA damage or influences central nervous system function, melatonin synthesis, permeability of the blood brain barrier (BBB), or reaction to neurotropic drugs. Reported RF-induced changes to eye structure and function should also be investigated.

Epidemiological studies should investigate: the use of mobile telephones with hand-held antennae and incidence of various cancers; reports of headache, sleep disturbance, and other subjective effects that may arise from proximity to RF emitters, and laboratory studies should be conducted on people reporting these effects; cohorts with high occupational RF exposure for changes in cancer incidence; adverse pregnancy outcomes in various highly RF exposed occupational groups; and ocular pathologies in mobile telephone users and in highly RF exposed occupational groups.

Studies of populations with residential exposure from point sources, such as broadcasting transmitters or mobile telephone base stations have caused widespread health concerns among the public, even though RF exposures are very low. Recent studies that may indicate an increased incidence of cancer in exposed populations should be investigated further. Bioelectromagnetics 19:1–19, 1998. © 1998 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
EMF AND HEALTH
Annual Review of Public Health
Vol. 26: 165-189 (Volume publication date April 2005)
First published online as a Review in Advance on October 12, 2004
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.26.021304.144445
Maria Feychting,1 Anders Ahlbom,1,2 and Leeka Kheifets3
1Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, S-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden; email: Maria.Feychting@imm.ki.se
2Division of Epidemiology, Stockholm Center of Public Health, 171 76 Stockholm, Sweden; email: Anders.Ahlbom@imm.ki.se
3Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095-1772; email: kheifets@ucla.edu
Quote
ABSTRACT

Electric and magnetic fields are ubiquitous in the modern society, and concerns have been expressed regarding possible adverse effects of these exposures. This review covers epidemiologic research on health effects of exposures to static, extremely low-frequency (ELF), and radio frequency (RF) fields. Research on ELF fields has been performed for more than two decades, and the methodology and quality of studies have improved over time. Studies have consistently shown increased risk for childhood leukemia associated with ELF magnetic fields, whereas ELF fields most likely are not a risk factor for breast cancer and cardiovascular disease. There are still inadequate data for other outcomes. More recently, focus has shifted toward RF exposures from mobile telephony. There are no persuasive data suggesting a health risk, but this research field is still immature with regard to the quantity and quality of available data. This technology is constantly changing and there is a need for continued research on this issue. Almost no epidemiologic data are available for static fields.

Effects of microwaves emitted by cellular phones on human slow brain potentials
    Gabriele Freude*,
    Peter Ullsperger,
    Siegfried Eggert and
    Ingeburg Ruppe
Article first published online: 6 JAN 1999
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-186X(1998)19:6<384::AID-BEM6>3.0.CO;2-Y
Bioelectromagnetics: Volume 19, Issue 6, pages 384–387, 1998
Quote
Keywords:

    Bereitschaftspotential;
    preparation;
    visual monitoring task;
    GSM system;
    human performance

Abstract

The influence of electromagnetic fields (EMF) emitted by cellular phones on preparatory slow brain potentials (SP) was studied in two different experimental tasks: In the first, healthy male human subjects had to perform simple self-paced finger movements to elicit a Bereitschaftspotential; in the second, they performed a complex and cognitive demanding visual monitoring task (VMT). Both tasks were performed with and without EMF exposure in counterbalanced order. Whereas subjects' performance did not differ between the EMF exposure conditions, SP parameters were influenced by EMF in the VMT: EMF exposure effected a significant decrease of SPs at central and temporo-parieto-occipital brain regions, but not at the frontal one. In the simple finger movement task, EMF did not affect the Bereitschaftspotential. Bioelectromagnetics 19:384–387, 1998. © 1998 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Workgroup Report: Base Stations and Wireless Networks: Radiofrequency (RF) Exposures and Health Consequences
Peter A. Valberg, T. Emilie van Deventer and Michael H. Repacholi
Environmental Health Perspectives
Vol. 115, No. 3 (Mar., 2007), pp. 416-424
Published by: The National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS)
Article Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4133177
Quote
Environmental Health Perspectives © 2007 The National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS)
Abstract:

Radiofrequency (RF) waves have long been used for different types of information exchange via the airwaves-wireless Morse code, radio, television, and wireless telephony (i.e., construction and operation of telephones or telephonic systems). Increasingly larger numbers of people rely on mobile telephone technology, and health concerns about the associated RF exposure have been raised, particularly because the mobile phone handset operates in close proximity to the human body, and also because large numbers of base station antennas are required to provide widespread availability of service to large populations. The World Health Organization convened an expert workshop to discuss the current state of cellular-telephone health issues, and this article brings together several of the key points that were addressed. The possibility of RF health effects has been investigated in epidemiology studies of cellular telephone users and workers in RF occupations, in experiments with animals exposed to cell-phone RF, and via biophysical consideration of cell-phone RF electric-field intensity and the effect of RF modulation schemes. As summarized here, these separate avenues of scientific investigation provide little support for adverse health effects arising from RF exposure at levels below current international standards. Moreover, radio and television broadcast waves have exposed populations to RF for > 50 years with little evidence of deleterious health consequences. Despite unavoidable uncertainty, current scientific data are consistent with the conclusion that public exposures to permissible RF levels from mobile telephony and base stations are not likely to adversely affect human health.
Human health consequences of environmentally-modulated gene expression: potential roles of ELF–EMF induced epigenetic versus mutagenic mechanisms of disease†
    James E. Trosko*
Article first published online: 12 JUL 2000
DOI: 10.1002/1521-186X(200007)21:5<402::AID-BEM9>3.0.CO;2-N
Bioelectromagnetics: Volume 21, Issue 5, pages 402–406, July 2000
Quote
Keywords:

    EMF;
    epigenetic effects;
    cell-cell communication

Abstract

In order to determine if there might be biological and health consequences after exposures to extremely-low frequency electromagnetic fields (ELF–EMF), either experimentally or epidemiologically, mechanistic understanding of the potential means by which any environmental agent can affect cells in a multicellular organism has to be reviewed. The goal of this limited review is to demonstrate that, while the prevailing paradigm of the environmentally-induced acute and chronic diseases involves either cell killing (cytotoxicity) or gene/chromosome mutations (genotoxicity), alteration of the expression of genetic information at the transcriptional (turning genes “on” or “off”), translational (stabilizing or de-stabilizing the genetic message), or posttranslational (altering the gene product or protein) levels has the potential to contribute to various diseases. This latter mechanism, “epigenetic” toxicity, unlike the former two which are irreversible, is characterized by threshold-like action, multiple biochemical pathways and chronic, regular exposures to be effective. Ultimately, epigenetic toxicants affect one of four potential cell states, namely alteration of cell proliferation, cell differentiation, programmed cell death (apoptosis) or adaptive responses of differentiated cells. Bioelectromagnetics 21:402–406, 2000. © 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Non-cancer EMF effects related to children
    Maria Feychting*
Article first published online: 2 SEP 2005
DOI: 10.1002/bem.20153
Copyright © 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Bioelectromagnetics: Volume 26, Issue S7, pages S69–S74, 2005
Quote
Keywords:

    magnetic fields;
    radiofrequency fields;
    reproduction;
    congenital malformations;
    spontaneous abortions;
    epidemiology

Abstract

Potential adverse effects of electromagnetic field exposure on the developing child have been discussed during the last decades. Effects during fetal development could have major consequences and possibly lead to various adverse pregnancy outcomes. This study summarizes the evidence on adverse pregnancy outcomes in relation to extremely low frequency (ELF) and radiofrequency (RF) exposures and briefly discusses other potential health effects, excluding cancer, following childhood exposures to these fields. Most studies of ELF exposures have not demonstrated any consistent risk increases for adverse pregnancy outcomes, but limitations in the exposure assessment methods and very limited power to study high exposure levels prevents any conclusions. Findings of an increased risk of spontaneous abortion in relation to maximum magnetic field exposures in two studies need to be confirmed. Studies of RF exposure have mostly been limited to physiotherapists and although some positive findings have been reported, no specific type of malformation or other adverse outcome has been consistently reported. Different types of symptoms and effects on cognitive function in relation to both ELF and RF fields have been reported in adults, but scientific studies have not confirmed that these symptoms are caused by the electromagnetic fields. No information is available for children. Bioelectromagnetics Supplement 7:S69–S74, 2005. © 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Possible effects of electromagnetic fields (EMF) on human health--opinion of the scientific committee on emerging and newly identified health risks (SCENIHR)
A Ahlbom, J Bridges, R De Seze, L Hillert… - Toxicology, 2008 - researchgate.net
Upon request of the European Commission, the Scientific Committee on Emerging and
Newly Identified Health Risks (SCENIHR) has updated the previous opinion on “Possible
effects of Electromagnetic Fields (EMF), Radio Frequency Fields (RF) and Microwave
There is no progress without discipline.

If you want to post to this forum, then send me a PM.

Jhanananda

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4629
    • Great Wesern Vehicle
Re: Re: Electromagnetic radiation and health
« Reply #167 on: January 09, 2015, 03:44:35 PM »
Jan 09, My morning blood sugar reading this morning was 161

The hole in the sun's corona has produced significant levels of EMF, which has caused me considerable joint pain for the last 5 days.  I have found that I rest well at night inside my van, which I keep grounded. 

Two days ago I started wearing my electrically conductive outfit, and it helped on the first day; however, yesterday it did not seem to help. As soon as I retreated to my van for the night, I had quick relief from joint pain for the whole night. 

So, I will have to revise my conclusions from 2 days ago, and say, the EMF shielded suit made of conductive fabrics definitely works during Geomagnetic K-index disturbances of level 4 and below, which is what we have been having for at least a week now.  However, it does not seem to work for Geomagnetic K-index disturbances of level 5 and above, which we had in the last 2 days.

Additionally, my morning blood sugar readings have risen, and remain, 40 points above my previous baseline, which puts it at the top of the scale of normal.  So, I believe that there is a relationship between increased solar activity and my blood sugar level.  This also suggests that, while the EMF shielded suit reduces joint pain, it does not seem to protect against the rise of blood sugar levels.
Space Weather did not report any more solar activity

Real-Time Geomagnetic Conditions total magnetic field (scalar) TUC Tucson Geomagnetic station 47475.8nT to 47519.9nT, a variation of 44.1nT, with a mean of about 47515nT.
« Last Edit: January 25, 2015, 01:42:45 AM by Jhanananda »
There is no progress without discipline.

If you want to post to this forum, then send me a PM.

Jhanananda

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4629
    • Great Wesern Vehicle
Re: Re: Electromagnetic radiation and health
« Reply #168 on: January 10, 2015, 03:57:30 PM »
Jan 10, My morning blood sugar reading this morning was 136

I am back to having massive joint pain today.  It might be the coming 4 days of rain that we are expecting, but it might also be recent K-4 level solar activity reported today. I have watched this site now every day for about 9 months, and when I have joint pain, there is always solar activity reported there

Also, NOAA site that reports Real-Time Geomagnetic Conditions that reports from magnetic field observatories has turned out to be very useful.  The nearest one to me is in Tucson, and I have found when it is in the yellow and above I have massive joint pain, and it is in the yellow today. Total magnetic field (scalar) TUC Tucson Geomagnetic station 47486.6nT to 47525.2nT, a variation of 48.6nT, with a mean of about 47515nT.

I did find a solution.  I just tried wrapping a piece of insulated 12 gauge solid wire around my injured knee, which has the worst pain, and it worked in minutes to reduce the pain-level.  So, any unplugged in power cord will most probably work, just wrap it around your painful joints.

This actually reminds me when I worked as a psychiatric technician at a state metal hospital for the retarded in Tucson. There was the oldest known Down's Syndrome patient in the world.  Next to his bed he had a whole drawer full of extension cords, and every now and then I would see him sitting on his bed draping the power cords all over his body.  I thought it was because he was both retarded and insane.  But, now I think he was on to something.
Space Weather reported:
Quote from: NOAA
Space Weather Message Code: WARK04
Serial Number: 2437
Issue Time: 2015 Jan 10 1355 UTC

EXTENDED WARNING: Geomagnetic K-index of 4 expected
Extension to Serial Number: 2436
Valid From: 2015 Jan 10 0408 UTC
Now Valid Until: 2015 Jan 11 0111 UTC
Warning Condition: Onset

NOAA Space Weather Scale descriptions can be found at
www.swpc.noaa.gov/noaa-scales-explanation

Potential Impacts: Area of impact primarily poleward of 65 degrees Geomagnetic Latitude.
Induced Currents - Weak power grid fluctuations can occur.
Aurora - Aurora may be visible at high latitudes such as Canada and Alaska.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Space Weather Message Code: WARK04
Serial Number: 2436
Issue Time: 2015 Jan 10 0408 UTC

WARNING: Geomagnetic K-index of 4 expected
Valid From: 2015 Jan 10 0408 UTC
Valid To: 2015 Jan 10 1400 UTC
Warning Condition: Onset

NOAA Space Weather Scale descriptions can be found at
www.swpc.noaa.gov/noaa-scales-explanation

Potential Impacts: Area of impact primarily poleward of 65 degrees Geomagnetic Latitude.
Induced Currents - Weak power grid fluctuations can occur.
Aurora - Aurora may be visible at high latitudes such as Canada and Alaska.
« Last Edit: January 25, 2015, 01:38:40 AM by Jhanananda »
There is no progress without discipline.

If you want to post to this forum, then send me a PM.

Michel

  • Guest
Re: Re: Electromagnetic radiation and health
« Reply #169 on: January 10, 2015, 06:39:39 PM »
I did find a solution.  I just tried wrapping a piece of insulated 12 gauge solid wire around my injured knee, which has the worst pain, and it worked in minutes to reduce the pain-level.  So, any unplugged in power cord will most probably work, just wrap it around your painful joints.
Do you use duck tape to hold it in place around your knee? I know Red Green would. LOL

Michel

  • Guest
Re: Re: Electromagnetic radiation and health
« Reply #170 on: January 10, 2015, 06:57:44 PM »
I have arthritis in one of my fingers. I'll try wrapping a copper wire around it and see what happens.

Jhanananda

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4629
    • Great Wesern Vehicle
Re: Re: Electromagnetic radiation and health
« Reply #171 on: January 10, 2015, 11:29:27 PM »
Good question, Michel, and thanks for the laugh.  Do remember that the Red Green show is a parody of inventors; and I am certain that the writers somehow met me while vacationing in Tucson.  However, I have never been big on duct tape.  Fact is, solid core copper wire is stiff enough that it really does not need anything to hold it into place, other than properly shaping it around, and above the joint. 

The solid core copper wire, by the way, worked quite well.  I had it wrapped around all of my major joints. So, the only joint that I had any pain in today was the recently injured knee, and the pain was quite manageable.  I did take refuge for a nap in the van in the middle of the day, which further relieved the joint pain.
I have arthritis in one of my fingers. I'll try wrapping a copper wire around it and see what happens.
That I believe is a good idea, and please do let us know if it works at all.  Also, do you find that your arthritic finger has variable pain from day-to-day?  Or, is it a constant?  If it is variable, then it most probably is responding to variations in the earth's electromagnetic field.
« Last Edit: January 10, 2015, 11:32:17 PM by Jhanananda »
There is no progress without discipline.

If you want to post to this forum, then send me a PM.

Michel

  • Guest
Re: Re: Electromagnetic radiation and health
« Reply #172 on: January 10, 2015, 11:44:41 PM »
However, I have never been big on duct tape.  Fact is, solid core copper wire is stiff enough that it really does not need anything to hold it into place, other than properly shaping it around, and above the joint.
I have an abdominal hernia. I use duck tape to keep it in place sometimes when I go out so I won't draw attention. Works real good.

That I believe is a good idea, and please do let us know if it works at all.  Also, do you find that your arthritic finger has variable pain from day-to-day?  Or, is it a constant?  If it is variable, then it most probably is responding to variations in the earth's electromagnetic field.
I tried 16 gauge insulated copper wire. It doesn't seem to work. I especially notice the pain in the finger joint when I play the guitar. I don't play very often in part due to this. It is really unnoticeable when I don't use it. I don't notice any variation in the intensity of the pain.
« Last Edit: January 11, 2015, 12:10:50 AM by Michel »

Jhanananda

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4629
    • Great Wesern Vehicle
Re: Re: Electromagnetic radiation and health
« Reply #173 on: January 11, 2015, 12:44:03 AM »
Then, copper wire may not help your finger, but you could try bare copper wire, if you wanted to pursue this.
There is no progress without discipline.

If you want to post to this forum, then send me a PM.

Jhanananda

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4629
    • Great Wesern Vehicle
Re: Re: Electromagnetic radiation and health
« Reply #174 on: January 11, 2015, 06:23:56 PM »
Jan 11, My morning blood sugar reading this morning was 134

The Real-Time Geomagnetic Conditions for most of North America were on the scale of Yellow, which for me results in joint pain.  However, I slept well in the grounded van all night, and awoke this morning with less joint pain than I have had since I injured my right knee.  Today I wore the EMF suit, with copper coils around my major joints.  There was some joint pain, but much less than the day before. Total magnetic field (scalar) TUC Tucson Geomagnetic station 47475.8nT to 47522.3nT, a variation of 46.5nT, with a mean of about 47512nT.

Space Weather reported another solar event:
Quote from: NOAA
Space Weather Message Code: WARK04
Serial Number: 2438
Issue Time: 2015 Jan 11 0715 UTC

WARNING: Geomagnetic K-index of 4 expected
Valid From: 2015 Jan 11 0714 UTC
Valid To: 2015 Jan 11 1700 UTC
Warning Condition: Onset

NOAA Space Weather Scale descriptions can be found at
www.swpc.noaa.gov/noaa-scales-explanation

Potential Impacts: Area of impact primarily poleward of 65 degrees Geomagnetic Latitude.
Induced Currents - Weak power grid fluctuations can occur.
Aurora - Aurora may be visible at high latitudes such as Canada and Alaska.
« Last Edit: January 25, 2015, 01:33:39 AM by Jhanananda »
There is no progress without discipline.

If you want to post to this forum, then send me a PM.

Jhanananda

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4629
    • Great Wesern Vehicle
Re: Re: Electromagnetic radiation and health
« Reply #175 on: January 12, 2015, 04:31:29 PM »
Jan 12, My morning blood sugar reading this morning was 130. Joint pain continues, but is improving.

Space Weather reported no further solar activity:
The Real-Time Geomagnetic Conditions for most of North America were on the scale of Yellow for the F channel only. All other channels are now green.  Total magnetic field (scalar) TUC Tucson Geomagnetic station 47480.3nT to 47524.4nT, a variation of 44.1nT, with a mean of about 47518nT.

With my health seeming to decline as the Solar Max increased, and my health improving from shielding and grounding, I have taken an interest in understanding more about EMF and its effect on health.  So I searched Google for some scholarly articles on the subject and found this one:

Possible effects of electromagnetic fields (EMF) on human health—Opinion of the Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks (SCENIHR)
Quote
ABSTRACT
The Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks (SCENIHR) has updated the previous opinion on ”Possible effects of Electromagnetic
Fields (EMF), Radio Frequency Fields (RF) and Microwave Radiation on human health” by the Scientific Committee on Toxicity, Ecotoxicity and the Environment (CSTEE) from 2001, with respect to whether or not exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMF) is a cause of disease or other health effects. The opinion is primarily based on scientific articles, published in English language peer-reviewed scientific journals. Only studies that are considered relevant for the task are cited and commented upon in the opinion. The opinion is divided into frequency (f) bands, namely: radio frequency (RF) (100 kHz < f ≤ 300 GHz), intermediate frequency (IF) (300 Hz < f ≤ 100 kHz), extremely low frequency (ELF) (0< f ≤ 300 Hz), and static (0 Hz) (only static magnetic fields are considered in this opinion). There is a separate section for environmental effects.

Radio Frequency Fields (RF fields)
Since the adoption of the 2001 opinion extensive research has been conducted regarding possible health effects of exposure to low intensity RF fields, including epidemiologic, in vivo, and in vitro research.
In conclusion, no health effect has been consistently demonstrated at exposure levels below the limits of ICNIRP (International Committee on Non Ionising Radiation Protection) established in 1998. However, the database for evaluation remains limited especially for long-term low-level exposure.

Intermediate Frequency Fields (IF fields)
Experimental and epidemiological data from the IF range are very sparse. Therefore, assessment of acute health risks in the IF range is currently based on known hazards at lower frequencies and higher frequencies. Proper evaluation and assessment of possible health effects from long-term exposure to IF fields are important because human exposure to such fields is increasing due to new and emerging technologies.

Extremely low frequency fields (ELF fields)
The previous conclusion that ELF magnetic fields are possibly carcinogenic, chiefly based on occurrence of childhood leukaemia, is still valid. For breast cancer and cardiovascular disease, recent research has indicated that an association is unlikely. For neurodegenerative diseases and brain tumours, the link to ELF fields remains uncertain.
No consistent relationship between ELF fields and self-reported symptoms (sometimes referred to as electrical hypersensitivity) has been demonstrated.

Static Fields
Adequate data for proper risk assessment of static magnetic fields are very sparse. Developments of technologies involving static magnetic fields, e.g. with MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) equipment require risk assessments to be made in relation to occupational exposure.

Environmental Effects
There are insufficient data to identify whether a single exposure standard is appropriate to protect all environmental species from EMF.
Similarly the data are inadequate to judge whether the environmental standards should be the same or significantly different from those appropriate to protect human health.

After Stu mentioned a flu epidemic in the USA, I then searched Google for it to find out more about the flu epidemic.  I found Influenza Pandemics of the 20th Century by Edwin D. Kilbourne
Quote
Three worldwide (pandemic) outbreaks of influenza occurred in the 20th century: in 1918, 1957, and 1968...Not classified as true pandemics are 3 notable epidemics: a pseudopandemic in 1947 with low death rates, an epidemic in 1977 that was a pandemic in children, and an abortive epidemic of swine influenza in 1976 that was feared to have pandemic potential...Major influenza epidemics show no predictable periodicity or pattern, and all differ from one another.
Even though the author states "Major influenza epidemics show no predictable periodicity or pattern, and all differ from one another," it does not take a genius to see that all of these dates are separated by decades.  This cannot be a coincidence.

So, I then searched Google for solar cycles and found These influenza outbreaks appear to be decadal; and fall right on solar maximums.


So, I then searched for Comets and Plagues and found this interesting research paper Comets and Contagion, where they link historic data on comets and plagues; and they too fall onto the solar cycles.  However, they unfortunately are arguing for Panspermia, which means that life comes from space, which I do not have a problem with, but I do have a problem with plagues originating from space.

I believe a better argument is: comets are debris fields and when they pass closely to the sun some of that debris impacts the sun, which causes sunspots, and coronal mass ejections, which increase the background Electromagnetic field (EMF), which tends to increase inflammation in at least a percentage of the population, which makes them susceptible to disease, which can be epidemic proportions if enough people are affected by disturbances of the earth's electromagnetic field.  These disturbances of the earth's electromagnetic field can also lead to mental illness, which can result in collective hysteria, which can result in war, or witch burnings.

Conclusion, build a Faraday Cage and have it accessible at all times.
« Last Edit: January 25, 2015, 01:26:37 AM by Jhanananda »
There is no progress without discipline.

If you want to post to this forum, then send me a PM.

Jhanananda

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4629
    • Great Wesern Vehicle
Re: Re: Electromagnetic radiation and health
« Reply #176 on: January 12, 2015, 11:47:44 PM »
Comet Encke

A Han Dynasty silk comet atlas, featuring drawings of comets believed by Victor Clube and Bill Napier to be related to the breakup of Encke's Comet in the past
Quote
or Encke's Comet (official designation: 2P/Encke) is a periodic comet that completes an orbit of the Sun once every 3.3 years. (This is the shortest period of a reasonable bright comet, but the faint main-belt comet 311P/PANSTARRS has a period of 3.2 years.) Encke was first recorded by Pierre Méchain in 1786, but it was not recognized as a periodic comet until 1819 when its orbit was computed by Johann Franz Encke; like Halley's Comet, it is unusual in being named after the calculator of its orbit rather than its discoverer. Like most other comets, it has a very low albedo, reflecting only 4.6% of the light it receives. The diameter of the nucleus of Encke's Comet is 4.8 km.[2]

Discovery

As its official designation implies, Encke's Comet was the first periodic comet discovered after Halley's Comet (designated 1P/Halley). It was independently observed by several astronomers, the second being Caroline Herschel in 1795.[3] Its orbit was calculated by Johann Franz Encke, who through laborious calculations was able to link observations of comets in 1786 (designated 2P/1786 B1), 1795 (2P/1795 V1), 1805 (2P/1805 U1) and 1818 (2P/1818 W1) to the same object. In 1819 he published his conclusions in the journal Correspondance astronomique, and predicted correctly its return in 1822 (2P/1822 L1). It was recovered by Carl Ludwig Christian Rümker at Parramatta Observatory on 2 June 1822.[4]
Orbit

Comets are in unstable orbits that evolve over time due to perturbations and outgassing. Given Encke's low orbital inclination near the ecliptic and brief orbital period of 3 years, the orbit of Encke is frequently perturbed by the inner planets.[5]

Encke's orbit gets as close as 0.17309 AU (25,894,000 km; 16,090,000 mi) to Earth (minimum orbit intersection distance).[5] On 4 July 1997 Encke passed 0.19 AU from Earth, and on June 29, 2172 it will make a close approach of roughly 0.1735 AU.[5] On 18 November 2013 it passed 0.02496 AU (3,734,000 km; 2,320,000 mi) from Mercury.[5] Close approaches to Earth usually occur every 33 years.

The failed CONTOUR mission was launched to study this comet, and also Schwassmann-Wachmann 3. On April 20, 2007, STEREO-A observed the tail of Comet Encke to be temporarily torn off by magnetic field disturbances caused by a coronal mass ejection (a blast of solar particles from the Sun).[6] The tail grew back due to the continuous shedding of dust and gas by the comet.[7]

Meteor showers
Comet Encke is believed to be the originator of several related meteor showers known as the Taurids (which are encountered as the Northern and Southern Taurids across November, and the Beta Taurids in late June and early July).[8][9] A shower has similarly been reported affecting Mercury.[10]

Near-Earth object 2004 TG10 may be a fragment of Encke.[11]
Mercury

Measurements on-board the NASA satellite MESSENGER have revealed Encke may contribute to seasonal meteor showers on Mercury. The Mercury Atmospheric and Surface Composition Spectrometer (MASCS) instrument discovered seasonal surges of calcium since the probe began orbiting the planet in March 2011. The spikes in calcium levels are thought to originate from small dust partials hitting the planet and knocking calcium-bearing molecules into the atmosphere in a process called impact vaporization. However, the general background of interplanetary dust in the inner Solar System cannot, by itself, account for the periodic spikes in calcium. This suggests a periodic source of additional dust, for example, a cometary debris field. [12]
Effects on Earth

More than one theory has associated Encke's Comet with impacts of cometary material on Earth, and with cultural significance.

The Tunguska event of 1908, probably caused by the impact of a cometary body, has also been postulated by Czechoslovakian astronomer Ľubor Kresák as a fragment of Comet Encke.[13]

Importance in the scientific history of luminiferous aether

Comet Encke (and Biela's Comet) had a role in scientific history in the generally discredited concept of luminiferous aether. As its orbit was perturbed and shortened, the shortening could only be ascribed to the drag of an "ether" through which it orbited in outer space. One reference, [1], reads:

    Encke's comet is found to lose about two days in each successive period of 1200 days. Biela's comet, with twice that length of period, loses about one day. That is, the successive returns of these bodies is found to be accelerated by this amount. No other cause for this irregularity has been found but the agency of the supposed ether.
« Last Edit: January 12, 2015, 11:49:30 PM by Jhanananda »
There is no progress without discipline.

If you want to post to this forum, then send me a PM.

Jhanananda

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4629
    • Great Wesern Vehicle
Re: Re: Electromagnetic radiation and health
« Reply #177 on: January 13, 2015, 07:23:36 PM »
Jan 13, My morning blood sugar reading this morning was 149. Joint pain continues, and has worsened.

The Real-Time Geomagnetic Conditions for most of North America were on the scale of Yellow for the F channel only. All other channels are still green. 
Real-Time Geomagnetic Conditions total magnetic field (scalar) TUC Tucson Geomagnetic station 47472.9nT to 47527.5nT, a variation of 54.6nT, with a mean of about 47520nT.

Space Weather reported more solar activity:
Quote
Space Weather Message Code: SUMXM5
Serial Number: 133
Issue Time: 2015 Jan 13 0444 UTC

SUMMARY: X-ray Event exceeded M5
Begin Time: 2015 Jan 13 0413 UTC
Maximum Time: 2015 Jan 13 0424 UTC
End Time: 2015 Jan 13 0438 UTC
X-ray Class: M5.6
Optical Class: 2b
Location: N06W70
NOAA Scale: R2 - Moderate

NOAA Space Weather Scale descriptions can be found at
www.swpc.noaa.gov/noaa-scales-explanation

Potential Impacts: Area of impact centered primarily on sub-solar point on the sunlit side of Earth.
Radio - Limited blackout of HF (high frequency) radio communication for tens of minutes.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Space Weather Message Code: SUM10R
Serial Number: 653
Issue Time: 2015 Jan 13 0442 UTC

SUMMARY: 10cm Radio Burst
Begin Time: 2015 Jan 13 0419 UTC
Maximum Time: 2015 Jan 13 0421 UTC
End Time: 2015 Jan 13 0423 UTC
Duration: 4 minutes
Peak Flux: 290 sfu
Latest Penticton Noon Flux: 159 sfu

NOAA Space Weather Scale descriptions can be found at
www.swpc.noaa.gov/noaa-scales-explanation

Description: A 10cm radio burst indicates that the electromagnetic burst associated with a solar flare at the 10cm wavelength was double or greater than the initial 10cm radio background. This can be indicative of significant radio noise in association with a solar flare. This noise is generally short-lived but can cause interference for sensitive receivers including radar, GPS, and satellite communications.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Space Weather Message Code: ALTXMF
Serial Number: 248
Issue Time: 2015 Jan 13 0425 UTC

ALERT: X-Ray Flux exceeded M5
Threshold Reached: 2015 Jan 13 0423 UTC
NOAA Scale: R2 - Moderate

NOAA Space Weather Scale descriptions can be found at
www.swpc.noaa.gov/noaa-scales-explanation

Potential Impacts: Area of impact centered on sub-solar point on the sunlit side of Earth. Extent of blackout of HF (high frequency) radio communication dependent upon current X-ray Flux intensity. For real-time information on affected area and expected duration please see http://www.swpc.noaa.gov/products/d-region-absorption-predictions-d-rap.
« Last Edit: January 25, 2015, 01:22:10 AM by Jhanananda »
There is no progress without discipline.

If you want to post to this forum, then send me a PM.

Jhanananda

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4629
    • Great Wesern Vehicle
Re: Re: Electromagnetic radiation and health
« Reply #178 on: January 14, 2015, 03:49:23 PM »
No further solar events have been recorded, but yesterday's solar events seem to have triggered my Rheumatoid arthritis.

Jan 14, My morning blood sugar reading this morning was 174

Real-Time Geomagnetic Conditions total magnetic field (scalar) TUC Tucson Geomagnetic station 47476.7nT to 47530.9nT, a variation of 44.2nT, with a mean of about 47520nT.
« Last Edit: January 25, 2015, 01:17:23 AM by Jhanananda »
There is no progress without discipline.

If you want to post to this forum, then send me a PM.

Jhanananda

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4629
    • Great Wesern Vehicle
Re: Re: Electromagnetic radiation and health
« Reply #179 on: January 15, 2015, 02:46:37 AM »
Jan 15, My morning blood sugar reading this morning was 164

Real-Time Geomagnetic Conditions total magnetic field (scalar) TUC Tucson Geomagnetic station 47479.1nT to 47524.8nT, a variation of 45.7nT, with a mean of about 47520nT.

I just stumbled across a list of the solar storms for the last 4 years.  It might be interesting for people to compare these dates with any physical or emotional crises.

Peak Dst, Name, Date
0   5 April 2010   2010-04-05
30   14 February 2011   2011-02-14
-93   26 September 2011   2011-09-26
-66   23 January 2012   2012-01-23
-119   1 October 2012   2012-10-01
-120   1 June 2013   2013-06-01
-95   19 February 2014   2014-02-19
0   12 September 2014   2014-09-12
« Last Edit: January 25, 2015, 01:12:12 AM by Jhanananda »
There is no progress without discipline.

If you want to post to this forum, then send me a PM.